Development Partners in Nepal

SPM # Standard Performance Measure AusAID GAVI GFATM UK UNAIDS UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank
2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆ 2007 2009 Rating ∆
1DP Partner has signed commitment to (or documented support for) the IHP+ country compact, or equivalent agreement, where they exist. N/A
(2008)		 100
 N/A
 0
 N/A
 0
(2008)		 N/A
 100
 N/A
 100
 N/A
 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
 N/A
 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
2DPa Percent of aid flows to the health sector that is reported on national health sector budgets. 100
(2008)		 76
 -
(2005)		 -
 232 184
(2008)		 56 67
 N/A N/A
 18
(2005)		 37
 58
(2005)		 92
 36
(2005)		 21
 100
(2005)		 100
2DPb Percent of current capacity-development support provided through coordinated programmes consistent with national plans/strategies for the health sector. -
(2008)		 -
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 N/A N/A
(2008)		 100 100
 N/A N/A
 100
(2005)		 100
 55
(2005)		 69
 36
(2005)		 21
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
2DPc Percent of health sector aid provided as programme based approaches. 50
(2008)		 76
 100
(2005)		 100
 100 38
(2008)		 56 100
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 24
(2005)		 22
 70
(2005)		 85
 28
(2005)		 20
 100
(2005)		 100
3DP Percent of health sector aid provided through multi-year commitments. 50
(2008)		 76
 100
(2005)		 100
 78 23
(2008)		 100 100
 N/A N/A
 100
(2005)		 100
 100
(2005)		 100
 -
(2005)		 -
 100
(2005)		 100
4DP Percent of health sector aid disbursements released according to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year frameworks. 50
(2008)		 76
 99
(2005)		 100
 - 69
(2008)		 100 100
 N/A N/A
 100
(2005)		 100
 80
(2005)		 100
 100
(2005)		 100
 100
(2005)		 100
5DPa Percent of health sector aid that uses country procurement systems. 100
(2008)		 100
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 0 64
(2008)		 7 6
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 0
(2005)		 0
 0
(2005)		 0
 0
(2005)		 0
 -
(2005)		 -
5DPb Percent of health sector aid that uses public financial management systems. N/A
(2008)		 N/A
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 N/A N/A
(2008)		 N/A N/A
 N/A N/A
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
 N/A
(2005)		 N/A
()
5DPc Number of parallel project implementation units (pius) per country. 0
(2008)		 0
 N/A
(plea)		 N/A
 0 0
(2008)		 1 1
 N/A
(plea)		 N/A
 7 0
 0
(2008)		 0
 0 0
 0
(plea)		 0
6DP Partner uses the single national performance assessment framework, where they exist, as the primary basis to assess progress (of support to health sector). 100
(2005)		 100
 0
(2005)		 0
 100 100
(2008)		 100 100
 -
(2005)		 100
 100
(2005)		 100
 0
(2005)		 0
 100
(2005)		 100
 100
(2005)		 100
7DP Partner has participated in mutual assessment of progress implementing commitments in the health sector, including on aid effectiveness, if a mutual assessment process exists. N/A
(2005)		 100
 N/A
(2005)		 0
 N/A N/A
(2008)		 N/A 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
 N/A
(2005)		 100
8DP Evidence of support for civil society to be actively represented in health sector policy processes - including health sector planning, coordination & review mechanisms. 0
(plea)		 100
 0
(2005)		 0
 100 100
(2008)		 0 0
 100 100
 100 100
 0
(2005)		 0
 0
(plea)		 0
 0
(2005)		 100
Important information about these ratings:
Notes on methods:
Notes on interpretation:
The exercise has been largely self-reported, and it has been difficult to find opportunities to triangulate data without imposing significant transaction costs.
  • The consistency of interpretation for key terms and definitions between participating agencies may vary within this country. This could affect the comparability of results.
  • For Development Partner SPM ratings it is important to note that the country context has a significant impact on the extent to which progress can be made by Development Partners for each of the Standard Performance Measures. Comparisons of performance across the country offices of a single agency should be made with this in mind.